1.5 hours
3 hours
6 hours
12 hours
Today's
last visit -
Post Message
Search
Overview
Register
Login
Admin
Franchini Canes - And Franchini Beads?
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-09 20:40
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
Thank you Jamey...
---
TASART
(
2009-11-10 03:24
) (
0 reads
)
link
img
Earliest Venetian millefiori on BCN?
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-10 05:09
) (
0 reads
)
link
a blow up to help see
---
TASART
(
2009-11-10 06:38
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
You were here!
Degumeys' bead enhanced
---
David
(
2009-11-10 06:38
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
It reminds me of this bead originally found in Peru
---
Carl Dreibelbis
(
2009-11-10 06:53
) (
0 reads
)
link
Difficult or imossible to count the layers on Degumey's bead? but ...
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-10 11:58
) (
0 reads
)
Are you referring to the number of layers in the canes? What would be the point?
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-10 20:50
) (
0 reads
)
Responding (gratefully) to David and Thomas’ enhancements ....
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-11 03:54
) (
0 reads
)
Seeing is believing!
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-11 15:03
) (
0 reads
)
Hi Jamey
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-12 04:58
) (
0 reads
)
Re: Bandiera Beads
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-12 12:06
) (
0 reads
)
Correction: Bandera beads
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-13 03:37
) (
0 reads
)
Re: More Terms
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-16 05:35
) (
0 reads
)
That's right and I realised "cylindrical" was better than "tubular"
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-16 05:56
) (
0 reads
)
You are welcome. And, yes, it can be!
(no text)
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-16 06:36
) (
0 reads
)
Degumay's bead is a 15th-16th C. Venetian bead. Too early for Franchini!
(no text)
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-10 17:38
) (
0 reads
)
15th 16th century bead.
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-11 04:22
) (
0 reads
)
I would love to provide a worthy answer when I have time. I DO have answers!
(no text)
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-11 05:36
) (
0 reads
)
looking forward to it
(no text)
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-11 05:54
) (
0 reads
)
Re: 15th 16th century bead.
---
JP
(
2009-11-12 19:39
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
Re: The Earliest Reasonably-Dated 19th C. Venetian Millefiori Bead
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-13 02:04
) (
0 reads
)
looking forward to your pic, thanks
(no text)
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-13 03:57
) (
0 reads
)
Re: Re: The Earliest Reasonably-Dated 19th C. Venetian Millefiori Bead
---
jp
(
2009-11-13 09:21
) (
0 reads
)
Thanks for posting the image.
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-13 03:49
) (
0 reads
)
Your millefiori book ...
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-13 04:58
) (
0 reads
)
Re: Your millefiori book ...
---
jp
(
2009-11-13 09:32
) (
0 reads
)
Looking forward to your images.
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-13 10:12
) (
0 reads
)
That's what Karlis' book is about—dating these sample cards.
(no text)
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-13 12:41
) (
0 reads
)
I've heard his name but have never seen the book. Hope to soon.
(no text)
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-13 12:50
) (
0 reads
)
The Levin Catalogue
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-16 05:48
) (
0 reads
)
link
I've already started looking round for the book in question
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-16 06:00
) (
0 reads
)
Impressive information and photos, thank you Jamey.
(no text)
---
freedomgood
(
2009-11-10 05:55
) (
0 reads
)
A few for comparison
---
beadweyr
(
2009-11-10 18:27
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
two more
---
beadweyr
(
2009-11-10 18:29
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
These are yet a another maker's attempt at copying Franchini poorly.
(no text)
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-10 20:43
) (
0 reads
)
a slightly different point of view....
---
TASART
(
2009-11-11 05:41
) (
0 reads
)
Re: a slightly different point of view....
---
BeadWeyr
(
2009-11-11 06:42
) (
0 reads
)
right
---
TASART
(
2009-11-11 07:09
) (
0 reads
)
Re: Points of View....
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-11 07:20
) (
0 reads
)
Please note—This long reply was being composed while the two previous comments were being posted.
(no text)
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-11 07:22
) (
0 reads
)
I like Antonio Dei Rossi
---
napoleone
(
2009-11-12 06:05
) (
0 reads
)
link
Interesting to compare...
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-12 06:35
) (
0 reads
)
somewhere you are missing something
---
TASART
(
2009-11-12 07:43
) (
0 reads
)
I may well be wrong but...
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-12 09:43
) (
0 reads
)
Re: I may well be wrong but...
---
TASART
(
2009-11-12 09:59
) (
0 reads
)
Perhaps the difference is ....
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-12 10:16
) (
0 reads
)
you and me both :)
(no text)
---
TASART
(
2009-11-12 10:19
) (
0 reads
)
The Composite Methods and Comparisons
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-12 12:41
) (
0 reads
)
Thanks Jamey
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-13 03:55
) (
0 reads
)
This is fantastic work! Where are his beads (!) ?
(no text)
---
Beadman
(
2009-11-12 12:44
) (
0 reads
)
Re: This is fantastic work! Where are his beads (!) ?
---
sisterray
(
2009-11-12 13:12
) (
0 reads
)
some more well done examples, not beads...
---
TASART
(
2009-11-12 13:53
) (
0 reads
)
link
img
You couldn't really justify drilling a hole in these, could you? :o
(no text)
---
brianbrian
(
2009-11-13 05:13
) (
0 reads
)
Forum
Back