Post Message Search Overview RegisterLoginAdmin
Why didn't the Chinese make beads like ojime?
Post Reply Edit View All Forum
Posted by: beadiste Post Reply
05/23/2017, 17:15:29

The pics show pieces that I suspect are from the same time period - 1890s - WWI.

The Chinese dragon matchbox cover displays a frankly breathtaking level of detail for such a small utilitarian object.

So at least one Chinese workshop could have made beads the equal of the ojime pictured ... but they did not, not until around the 1950s-1970s, as best as I can piece together the evidence.

I suspect the reason why involves a century of tragedy and undiscerning clientele?

Anyone else have some explanations?

SAM_8030_(491x504).jpg (251.8 KB)  SAM_8031_(496x504).jpg (254.9 KB)  


Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Comparison with large bowl
Re: Why didn't the Chinese make beads like ojime? -- beadiste Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: beadiste Post Reply
05/23/2017, 17:23:52

The bowl in the ormolu stand is about 10", if I recall correctly, and is dated to c1895-1900.

The matchbox compresses the same composition and iconography into something just over 3 square inches.

19thCenturyB_(504x459).jpg (205.0 KB)  


Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Comparison with a charger dated to c1890
Re: Comparison with large bowl -- beadiste Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: beadiste Post Reply
05/23/2017, 17:29:02

19thCenturyPlateNoteRuyiPattern_(576x498).jpg (225.4 KB)  


Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users


Forum     Back