1.5 hours
3 hours
6 hours
12 hours
Today's
last visit -
Post Message
Search
Overview
Register
Login
Admin
Bead ID please
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-12 06:51
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
Re: Bead ID please
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-13 13:35
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
You were here!
Re: Re: Bead ID please
---
judy
(
2016-01-13 17:54
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
I have had hundreds of original Pema Rakta beads, and this looks authentic...
---
jake
(
2016-01-13 19:05
) (
0 reads
)
Re: I have had hundreds of original Pema Ratka beads, and this looks authentic...
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-13 20:39
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
Hello LD, Hard to know from these photo's, but IMHO could be an authentic Pema Rakta
---
jake
(
2016-01-13 22:41
) (
0 reads
)
link
It is a very beautiful reproduction.
---
Frederick II
(
2016-01-13 18:15
) (
0 reads
)
Re: It is a very beautiful reproduction.
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-13 20:48
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
another photo
---
nishedha
(
2016-01-14 09:37
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
Re: It is a very beautiful reproduction.
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-14 12:04
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
the hole is not as it should if ancient
(no text)
---
nishedha
(
2016-01-14 00:45
) (
0 reads
)
Re: the hole is not as it should if ancient
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-14 12:09
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
Not bad. Nicer the pinky butt.
(no text)
---
nishedha
(
2016-01-14 13:02
) (
0 reads
)
Re: Re: the hole is not as it should if ancient
---
Rubyzane
(
2016-01-14 13:05
) (
0 reads
)
Re: Re: Re: the hole is not as it should if ancient
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-14 20:06
) (
0 reads
)
I don't think LD's bead should be labeled a reproduction.
---
jake
(
2016-01-14 15:48
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
Previously seen here... Examples of my craft.
---
jake
(
2016-01-14 16:09
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
Re: Previously seen here... Examples of my craft.
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-14 20:09
) (
0 reads
)
2 more pictures
---
judy
(
2016-01-14 16:14
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
Sweet Judy... Two more
---
jake
(
2016-01-14 16:20
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
your pema raka are superb! we did the last two postings simultaneously!
(no text)
---
judy
(
2016-01-14 18:05
) (
0 reads
)
Re: I don't think LD's bead should be labeled a reproduction.
---
Odan
(
2016-01-15 08:39
) (
0 reads
)
Re: Re: I don't think LD's bead should be labeled a reproduction.
---
karavanserai
(
2016-01-16 13:18
) (
0 reads
)
Some help plse to understand the comments
---
karavanserai
(
2016-01-15 06:10
) (
0 reads
)
Re: Some help plse to understand the comments
---
rubyzane
(
2016-01-15 11:05
) (
0 reads
)
Some pics of mine
---
rubyzane
(
2016-01-15 10:49
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
2 more....
---
rubyzane
(
2016-01-15 10:51
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
& others...
---
rubyzane
(
2016-01-15 10:52
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
another type...
---
rubyzane
(
2016-01-15 10:53
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
final 2 shots
---
rubyzane
(
2016-01-15 10:54
) (
0 reads
)
file
img
I agree...
---
karavanserai
(
2016-01-16 13:14
) (
0 reads
)
There are clear definitions and exceptions to every rule.
---
Frederick II
(
2016-01-15 11:57
) (
0 reads
)
Can anyone explain the obvious undercutting...
---
beadiste
(
2016-01-16 15:16
) (
0 reads
)
My questions: Chinese? Soaked in hydrofluoric acid? Then polished? Therefore salmon effect?
(no text)
---
Frederick II
(
2016-01-16 17:13
) (
0 reads
)
Re: My questions: Chinese? Soaked in hydrofluoric acid? Then polished? Therefore salmon effect?
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-16 21:20
) (
0 reads
)
Re: My questions: Chinese? Soaked in hydrofluoric acid? Then polished? Therefore salmon effect?
---
lindabd
(
2016-01-26 01:49
) (
0 reads
)
Forum
Back