Post: Post Reply: I didn’t see any mention of “sorcerer” in the article by Rosanna

Original Message: I didn’t see any mention of “sorcerer” in the article

So I assumed you used that word to summarize the writer’s suppositions about why the beads were collected. Probably I missed something. Anyway, it struck me that you would use sorcerer rather than sorceress. I was also attempting a comment concerning the bias that people display when they assume beads and ornaments were (and are) for women exclusively. The bead community is both broad and deep, something I greatly appreciate! Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users

Original Message: I didn’t see any mention of “sorcerer” in the article
So I assumed you used that word to summarize the writer’s suppositions about why the beads were collected. Probably I missed something. Anyway, it struck me that you would use sorcerer rather than sorceress. I was also attempting a comment concerning the bias that people display when they assume beads and ornaments were (and are) for women exclusively. The bead community is both broad and deep, something I greatly appreciate! Copyright 2024 All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users

Back Post Reply

Name
  Register

Password

E-Mail

Subject

Private Reply   Make all replies private

Message
HTML tags allowed in message body. Browser view     Display HTML as text.

Link URL

Link Title

Image URL

Attachment file (<256 kb)

Attachment file (<256 kb)