| Original Message: Re: Muracad |
|---|
|
For the benefit of any forumites who are interested: “Kiffa Beads,” Ornament, 20:1, 1996. It is an article Jürgen knows about quite well, as I discussed it with him when he was at my home in 1995. For the past twenty-five years, I have been the primary proponent for understanding the ancient technology of glass-beadmaking, and distinguishing between Roman Period beads and later beads (essentially post-Roman and Islamic Period beads). I don't know how Mr. Busch could miss that. I should "cite references"? I WRITE this work (including here), and have often lectured upon it at museums, universities, and other institutions, here and abroad. No "contradiction." Mr. Busch clearly did not understand what I intimated. "Muracad" is the name Kirk Stanfield received from an informant in Mauritania. It has been published, and he has communicated to me that he believes the name Mr. Busch prefers is wrong. If Mr. Busch thinks he is not mistaken, he can prove it. My mind is open. The informant didn't speak to me..... Yes, the assumption regarding "rarity" is wrong. JDA. All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users |
|
|