Post Message Search Overview RegisterLoginAdmin
fossil beads from Cambodia
Post Reply Edit View All Forum
Posted by: will Post Reply
09/29/2007, 12:06:10

Hi Everyone,

I spent more than a month earlier this year in some fairly remote villages in northern Cambodia. My partner was working, so, in between running errands for her, I got to hang out with the local ne'er-do-wells. It was the dry season, post rice harvest, so there wasn't a lot of farm work going on, and some of them had been digging up some ancient burial sites. Of course, they were hoping for Khmer Angkor-period bronze which they would be able to sell to dealers. Ever since the civil war more or less ended there has been a plentiful supply of metal and mine detectors in Cambodia, and these have been a great stimulus to illegal "archaeology". But the graves my friends had found pretty much by chance were older, pre-Bronze Age, and they had simply thrown away most of what they had dug up. However, they had kept a necklace of fossil beads, and one rather drunken evening they decided to give it to me (that day I had driven their rice to market in the back of our truck).

I haven't been able to find out very much about beads that are fossils. There's quite a bit about beads that are made from fossilized materials (pumteks are the most famous), but the only other whole fossils I've seen pictured are in Lois Dubin's book, especially a somewhat similar necklace on page 20, which is dated to 28,000 BCE. That's much earlier than these would be; all I can say about their date is that I take them to be more than 3,000 years old (as beads, that is!). There's nothing in any official archaeology report from Cambodia about any similar beads, but they may be too unimportant to be mentioned, and perhaps there are a lot of them around without my knowing it.

I know nothing about fossils. There's a lot of Triassic (I think) limestone in the area. The larger beads are some kind of bivalve; the largest is a bit over 4 cms. The smaller disc-type beads (about 13-14 mm), which at first glance I thought were simply shell, seem to be fossils too. I've seen some fossil coral which is slightly similar, but nothing quite like this. They're actually very interesting in their formation; they appear to have been laid down in layers, with serrated edges produced by radiating "spoke-like" patterns. Mostly the beads are split along the layers, but sometimes the beads are composed of more than one layer.

I'd really appreciate any comments or information, and as usual I apologise for the pics. I'm struggling with focus (as in other areas, too!).

Best regards,

Will

SEAP83amed.jpg (42.4 KB)  SEAP83bmed.jpg (47.7 KB)  


Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Re: fossil beads from Cambodia, -Crinoids?
Re: fossil beads from Cambodia -- will Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: Stefany Post Reply
09/29/2007, 17:06:00



Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Re: fossil beads from Cambodia, -Crinoids?
Re: Re: fossil beads from Cambodia, -Crinoids? -- Stefany Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: will Post Reply
09/29/2007, 20:16:19

Thank you, Stefany.

It's amazing how one word can be so helpful. Five minutes ago, I'd never heard of crinoids; now, thanks to Wikipedia, I even know that their anuses were located next to their mouths! And a whole lot of other stuff besides.

Anyway, these are definitely the same fossils as the small beads on my Cambodian necklace. I attach a couple of pictures of them. Apparently they were perfectly designed for beads. Wikipedia again:

"St Cuthbert's beads (or Cuddy's beads) are circular columnals of Carboniferous crinoids which were strung together as a necklace or rosary in medieval Northumberland, and became associated with St Cuthbert. In Germany, the columnals were known as "Bonifacius Pfennige" (St Boniface's pennies). In other parts of England, circular crinoid columnals were known as "fairy money", pentagonal crinoid columnals were known as "star stones", and moulds of the stems left impressions which were known as screwstones.

"The "beads" are thick discs or short cylinders, which, in life, were articulated to form a branched structure, linked by soft tissue, nerves and ligaments which occupuied the central hole (lumen). The columnals often disarticulated after the animal died: articulated fossils are relatively rare."

I find it exciting that the same fossils could have been used for the same purpose in two such different cultures.

Thanks again, Stefany,

Will

Crinoids_2.jpg (62.1 KB)  CrinoidFossil.jpg (65.6 KB)  


Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Re: fossil beads from Cambodia, -Crinoids?
Re: Re: fossil beads from Cambodia, -Crinoids? -- will Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: Stefany Post Reply
09/30/2007, 03:33:31

The trouble is that St. Cuthbert himself predates the earliest known prayer beads! The association is only because he lived in one of the coastal areas where they are found.

Stefany



Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Re: fossil beads from Cambodia
Re: fossil beads from Cambodia -- will Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: napoleone Post Reply
09/30/2007, 13:41:03

Hi Will,
Stephany is right in identinfying the disks as crinoid stem elements. The shells are fossil brachiopods (I'm not able to say whether they are Triassic or Upper Palaeozoic in age). The necklace is freely restrung or it was restrung as it was found?
All the Best,
Giorgio



Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Re: fossil beads from Cambodia
Re: Re: fossil beads from Cambodia -- napoleone Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: will Post Reply
10/01/2007, 08:09:03

Hi Giorgio,

Thanks for the confirmation that these are crinoids.

I wasn't present when they were dug up, so I can't say for sure, but I think it's highly unlikely that this is actually how they were strung - as with most of the ancient beads we see and collect today. Looted gravesites are always such a mess that it's never easy to see what the configurations might have been. Back in January, I remember, there was a brief discussion here about this, and I said then that it was my impression that in later Bronze Age sites in Southeast Asia, the long glass and agate tube beads which were so valued were worn on a shortish string high up on the throat, rather than at the bottom of a long necklace, which is where we often tend to place them today. With Neolithic beads I don't have any substantive information at all. I was told that all these beads were found in a single grave, but there's no way to confirm even that. I think it may be possible that some at least of the bivalve fossils were worn as bracelets or even anklets. I wish I had been able to find out more.

Best,

Will



Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
brachiopods!
Re: fossil beads from Cambodia -- will Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: Luann Udell Post Reply
10/01/2007, 14:10:22

I used to collect these when I was a kid.

Luann Udell artist & writer Ancient stories retold in modern artifacts LuannUdell.com
Related link: brachiopods

Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Re: brachiopods!
Re: brachiopods! -- Luann Udell Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: will Post Reply
10/02/2007, 06:53:28

Thanks, Luann; that ties it down very nicely.

Will



Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Fossils from Tibet..........
Re: fossil beads from Cambodia -- will Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: bob Post Reply
10/02/2007, 11:44:56


Your photo reminds me of similar objects from Tibetan culture called 'rangjung'. Rangjung means something like "spontaneously formed" - objects from nature not made by man. Rocks, fossils, and a myriad range of weirdly formed natural objects that often resemble deities, sacred destinations like Kong Rimpoche (Mt Kalias) or even familiar everyday objects.

These will be familiar to you as the Thai & Burmese also embrace this concept in their amulets.

Below is a group of rangjung I collected in central Tibet many of which are similar to the crinoid stems and brachiopods in this thread. I believe these fossils are not imported but are found on the Tibetan plateau by drokpa (nomad) herders locally at elevations most of which are 12,000 feet or more. Movement of tectonic plates in ancient times pushed the ocean floor up to form the Himalayas. Most of these have been ritually consecrated on alters and have the traditional smokey patina from butter lamps.

Rangjung_rdo.jpg (146.1 KB)  boots.jpg (118.1 KB)  


Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
More weirdness from Tibet..........
Re: Fossils from Tibet.......... -- bob Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: bob Post Reply
10/02/2007, 11:54:26

These are made from the core of Turbinella Pyrum / Indian Chank shell formed into phallic amulets similar to the palad khik amulets commonly found in Thailand. These are not drilled for suspension but rather are displayed like rangjung.

The 'conch' shell (as it is known all over Asia even though it isn't one - no semantic arguments please) has spiritual significance all over South Asia and in Tibet it is one of the 'Tashi Targye' or eight lucky symbols represented as a 'Dun-Kar' or spiritual trumpet. It is a desirable raw material for religious paraphernalia and ornament alike.

Yes, that's a stalactite on the right!

As you can see these amulets are not so lucky for the unfortunate animals........

Chank_shell_amulets.jpg (110.6 KB)  Bad_news_bears.jpg (130.6 KB)  


Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Re: Fossils from Tibet..........
Re: Fossils from Tibet.......... -- bob Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: will Post Reply
10/02/2007, 14:54:27

Thank you, Bob.

These images remind me that many peasant houses in Isaan (Northeastern Thailand) and Cambodia still have two altars - one Buddhist and the other animist. The Buddhist altar is generally well tended with flowers and other regular offerings; the animist altar often looks quite neglected, with stones, shells and fossils, bits of broken pottery, dried fungus, etc, and it's hard to tell if the cobwebs and dead spiders on it are there by accident or design. But I'm told that it's just as important in people's lives. Natural forces, working through material objects, are felt to have great significance and power.

Best regards,

Will



Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Natural forces, working through material objects............
Re: Re: Fossils from Tibet.......... -- will Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: bob Post Reply
10/03/2007, 14:29:07

Maybe I am regressive but I suppose it works as well as praying.....

(Commentary on current whorled events)

I loved Tibet before all the wonderful modern development?

Dinosaur??? Perhaps - But I will say the food is much better today!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My buddy and I in a smoky yak hair drokpa (nomad) tent in Kongpo - Tibet.

My pomos (daughters) at the Snowland Restaurant where all the women are strong, all the men are good-looking, and all the children are above average.

They call me Ingie Pola (foreign grandfather).....
It's better than some of my nicknames!

Drokpa_tent.jpg (90.6 KB)  Snowland_pomos.jpg (77.2 KB)  


Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users
Bob, I love these photos, thank you!
Re: Natural forces, working through material objects............ -- bob Post Reply Edit Forum Where am I?
Posted by: Joyce Post Reply
10/03/2007, 20:07:30



Copyright 2024
All rights reserved by Bead Collector Network and its users


Forum     Back